Showing posts with label patient. Show all posts
Showing posts with label patient. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 03, 2015

Huntington’s disease patients ‘feel better’ after taking Auspex compound to control chorea in clinical trial

Huntington’s disease patients in a recently concluded clinical trial for a potential new drug to control the disease’s characteristic involuntary movements reported that they “felt better” overall.

The trial showed that the compound reduced chorea substantially and with fewer and milder side effects than a predecessor drug, a significant step, although it does not address the cognitive and psychiatric symptoms of HD nor attempts to be a “cure.”

Auspex Pharmaceuticals, a San Diego biotech firm focusing on hyperkinetic movement disorders and other rare diseases, announced the highly favorable results for the Phase III clinical trial for its substance SD-809 on December 16, 2014.

Like Xenazine, the first ever drug approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Huntington’s, SD-809 attacks chorea, the involuntary, sometimes dance-like movements caused by HD’s devastation of the brain.

As one of its “endpoints” (research targets), Auspex used the Patients’ Global Impression of Change scale to measure whether patients actually felt better. The patients’ responses showed convincingly that they did, in part as a result of controlling chorea.

I don’t think that there’s ever been a therapy with patients with HD that has actually demonstrated that patients actually feel better on this type of patient assessment,” Pratik Shah, Ph.D., the Auspex president and CEO, said in an interview at Auspex headquarters on December 23.

“This is something that in the past not everyone has been able to appreciate: the impact of chorea on the life of a patient. We wanted to put in an instrument that really asked the question: ‘Does this matter to the patient? Do you feel better?’ Given the fact that perhaps not everyone outside the HD community really understands the adverse impact of chorea on the life of a patient and their family, this was an important question to assess.”

The trial doctors were asked a similar set of questions about the trial participants. “The clinicians as well saw a favorable result here,” Dr. Shah said.

As a carrier of the HD gene mutation who lost his mother to HD nine years ago this month, I was thrilled to hear the news about SD-809 and to visit Auspex for the second time in recent months. You can watch my reaction in the video below.


Reducing chorea and side effects

Significantly, the clinical trial demonstrated that SD-809 reduced chorea substantially.

“We saw a 37 percentage-point improvement in the SD-809 arm and 16-percent improvement in the placebo arm, so it’s 21 percentage points above placebo,” Dr. Shah said. “This is very robust, when you look at all the historical data [from the Xenazine trial].”

Dr. Shah pointed out that the data are the sum of all the observations made on and by the participants.

“One person can have a two- or three-point reduction and experience great benefit, while a different individual may have the need for a greater numerical reduction,” he said.

According to one analyst who compared the two compounds, the reduction in chorea is about the same seen in the Xenazine trial.

However, SD-809 had fewer and far milder side effects than Xenazine. Both are taken as a pill. Neither attacks the root causes of HD, nor the psychiatric and cognitive symptoms that devastate most HD patients. So such drugs are not a “cure.”

Referring to the study data, cited in a press release on the Auspex website, Dr. Shah affirmed that SD-809 caused low levels of side effects such as depression, restlessness, anxiety, insomnia, sleepiness, irritability, and fatigue. SD-809 caused no problems with swallowing in any of the patients –  2.2% of those trial participants on placebo did experience difficulty with swallowing.

The minimal level of those side effects is important in HD, because the disease itself often causes such symptoms, in particular depression, which appeared to be lower in the SD-809 arm compared to placebo, Dr. Shah noted.


Pratik Shah, Ph.D. (photo by Gene Veritas)

In an assessment of the total motor (movement) score of the standard HD disease rating scale, SD-809 led to improvement – an outcome lacking in the Xenazine trial, Dr. Shah pointed out.

The improvement in this score suggests that movement problems other than chorea could be improving, he added.

Yet another trial measurement showed that participants’ “physical functioning” improved with SD-809, that is, movement required to do daily tasks such as walking and climbing stairs.

SD-809 as seen by HD experts

Ninety individuals took part in the Phase III trial, called First-HD, at 34 sites across the U.S. and Canada. Half received SD-809, half a placebo. All participants had at least moderate chorea. The study was double-blinded: neither doctors nor participants knew who was receiving the drug. This is the most rigorous form of clinical trial. Auspex ran the trial in conjunction with the Huntington Study Group (HSG).

None of the First-HD participants was taking Xenazine at the time of the trial. Auspex and the HSG also conducted a trial known as ARC-HD to study another group of participants already taking Xenazine but who switched the next day to SD-809 for the trial. ARC-HD demonstrated that the switch between drugs did not affect the reduction in chorea and occurred with no serious side effects. In fact, patients shifting to SD-809 had somewhat less chorea, and at smaller dosages, Dr. Shah noted.

“New, safe and tolerable therapies for chorea treatment are clearly needed to make this disease an increasingly treatable condition,” said Samuel A. Frank, M.D., an HSG researcher and principal investigator for First-HD, in the Auspex press release. “The primary and secondary efficacy results from this study were confirmed by the Huntington Study Group independent analysis. These clear and unequivocal results are clinically meaningful and suggest that SD-809 may play an important role in the treatment of Huntington's disease symptoms.”

Dr. LaVonne Goodman, the founder of the Huntington’s Disease Drug Works program and a clinician who has attended to scores of HD patients, echoed the optimistic conclusions about SD-809’s efficacy.

“This drug treats chorea with many fewer side effects associated with tetrabenazine [Xenazine],” she wrote. “And most important it improved quality of life.[…] If this drug lives up to the press release, it could/should replace antipsychotic drugs as primary treatment of chorea in Huntington's disease.”

Although not yet convinced that SD-809 is better than Xenazine overall, the researcher-written website HDBuzz.net affirmed in a generally positive article that the “very well-run” Auspex trials “prove that SD-809 could be a useful new tool to help fight excessive movements in Huntington’s disease.”

How it works

Xenazine’s scientific name is tetrabenazine, a drug discovered in the 1950s. HD-affected individuals used tetrabenazine for decades in Europe and Canada, where U.S. families purchased the drug on an individual basis in person or through mail order. Only in 2008 did it receive FDA approval.

Chemically SD-809 is an improvement on Xenazine. It is deutetrabenazine: a molecule with atoms of deuterium (heavy hydrogen) attached.

“We used in select places deuterium as a building block,” Dr. Shah explained, pointing to a model of SD-809 made by an Auspex scientist.


Dr. Shah explains the structure of SD-809 using a model built by an Auspex scientist. The colors represent the compound’s five atoms: carbon (black), hydrogen (white), oxygen (red), nitrogen (blue), and deuterium (green). In scientific terms, SD-809 (deutetrabenazine) is a VMAT2 inhibitor. (photo by Gene Veritas)

Very much like Xenazine, SD-809 inhibits certain chemical actions in the brain in order to avoid such symptoms as excess dopamine, which can lead to the involuntary movements of HD, Dr. Shah explained.

He added that the addition of deuterium “enabled this molecule to be broken down in the body more slowly and so it sticks around longer.” As a result, the levels of the drug in the bloodstream become “smoother.”

For patients, this means smaller, less frequent dosages and potentially a more optimal performance of the drug, he said.

Applying to the FDA

After the conclusion of First-HD and ARC-HD, over 90 percent of the trial participants (excluding a few who dropped out) entered a follow-up study so that Auspex can further analyze the effectiveness of SD-809 and the compound’s side effects. This ongoing study gives participants access to the compound, including those who were receiving the placebo during the trial.

On January 12, Auspex released additional good news resulting from its ongoing analysis of SD-809: whereas Xenazine’s instructions warn about the possibility of an abnormal, prolonged heartbeat, SD-809 does not cause such a symptom to the point of medical concern.

Dr. Shah stated that Auspex hopes to complete a New Drug Application for HD and SD-809 during the first half of this year. Review of such applications typically takes from six to twelve months, depending on the circumstances.

“We have a huge sense of urgency, especially given these [clinical trial] results, to do everything we can to put the application together as soon as we possibly can,” Dr. Shah emphasized.

Auspex has also submitted for FDA approval a list of possibilities for SD-809’s eventual commercial name.

On January 14, Auspex received orphan drug designation from the FDA for use of SD-809 in Tourette syndrome, another rare movement disorder. The company is currently conducting a Tourette clinical trial.

Last year, Auspex received the same designation for HD. Orphan drug status – for conditions affecting fewer than 200,000 people in the U.S. – provides special incentives for companies to produce drugs for these maladies.

Awaiting a price and revenues

Dr. Shah said that the company has not yet researched the price of the drug.

The exorbitant cost of some orphan drugs has caused deep concern among affected families and patient advocates. Lundbeck, which markets Xenazine, has a program to assist HD families with the high cost of its drug, which can reach $50,000 at the wholesale level for an annual supply (click here to read my previous article on the cost of orphan drugs).

“We remain committed as a company to making SD-809 available to those who need it as much as we can,” Dr. Shah commented.

As a young company that only sold stock publicly for the first time in 2014, Auspex has yet to generate revenues. Investors continue to support the company as it moves forward with clinical trials and new research, Dr. Shah explained.

Xenazine will lose its market exclusivity in August 2015 and become subject to generic competition. This development could put additional pressure on Auspex to market its drug affordably, but, at the same time, furnish the opportunity to stress its compound’s greater safety.

New hope and a platform for future research

We haven’t had a positive study in HD in many, many years, so it’s really an opportunity to celebrate a success that we’ve seen here and to recognize that this is an important step forward for the field and to kind of spread some good cheer and to have renewed hope for the field,” Dr. Shah concluded about the SD-809 trial. “It is also important for the community to remind the people who don’t know treating chorea does matter. It can affect and does affect people’s quality of life.”

Auspex hopes to use the SD-809 project as a platform for researching possible treatments that attack the causes of HD, Dr. Shah said.

“We’re always on the lookout for what makes sense to invest in there,” he added.

The success of the drug and its acceptance by HD families and clinicians could help provide the revenues needed to fund the new research into better remedies, he said.


Dr. Shah (left) with Gene Veritas (photo by Rachel Kenny, Auspex)

Friday, June 27, 2014

New California stem cell chief stresses speed and efficiency in search for treatments

A major hope of those facing Huntington's disease (and numerous other diseases) resides in stem cell research.

The new president and CEO of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM), transferring from the pharmaceutical industry, has assumed the helm of the $3 billion organization stressing efficiency, including a pledge to prioritize speedier development of treatments for the many diseases falling within the agency’s scope.

“What I promise I will do is to bring stem cell therapies and treatments to the patients that need them,” C. Randal Mills, Ph.D., chosen to run CIRM by its board of directors on April 30, said in San Diego on June 24 at the third of three “Meet the New CIRM President” events. “That is quite sincerely what I have done my entire career, and the only thing I care about and the only reason I came to CIRM.”

Dr. Mills was introduced by CIRM board chair Jonathan Thomas, J.D., Ph.D. The meeting took place in conjunction with the 2014 BIO International Convention, June 23-26, which showcased the work of leading biotech firms and featured a keynote speech by British business magnate Sir Richard Branson and a moderated Q & A with former Secretary of State and potential 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton. The convention attracted more than 15,000 participants from all 50 states and 70 countries.

Dr. Mills outlined four questions he said will guide him in decision-making at CIRM.

First, he said, "is whatever we're doing speeding up a treatment reaching a patient?"

Secondly, will CIRM’s activities increase the likelihood of a treatment reaching a patient? There are many “valleys of death,” or dead ends, in stem cell research, Dr. Mills noted.

Third, is CIRM meeting an unmet medical need, as opposed to a condition already successfully dealt with by other medical means?

Fourth, is CIRM doing all this efficiently?



Randy Mills speaks to disease advocates and stem cell industry representatives in San Diego (photo by Gene Veritas).

Taking care of patients

Dr. Mills said his patient-oriented outlook started during his undergraduate studies in microbiology and cell studies at the University of Florida, in Gainesville.

“During that time I worked as a medic in the emergency room,” he told the audience. “I saw and dealt with a lot of patients and got a pretty good sense of what patient care was like and delivery was like.”

Dr. Mills obtained his Ph.D. in drug development, also at the University of Florida. After that, he worked for the university as a specialist in orthopedic transplants. With a partner, Jamie Grooms, he started a company within the university specializing in spinal fusion, one of the most common of orthopedic procedures.

In 1995, the two “spun out” the company from the university, calling it University of Florida Tissue Bank. That year the company had $1 million in revenues, with only six employees. Five years later, when the firm went public, it had 550 employees and annual revenues of $120 million.

“More importantly, (we were) producing regenerative medicine solutions for patients all across the United States on the scale of hundreds of thousands of implants, and better implants, a year,” Dr. Mills explained.

“It was during that time that I really learned a lesson. And the key lesson is: if you take care of patients, then your business is going to follow. If you don’t take care of the patients, there is nothing you can do in order to get your business to come along.”

Randy Mills (Osiris photo)

Key achievements at Osiris

In 2004, at the age of 32, Dr. Mills was recruited to become the president and CEO of Osiris Therapeutics, Inc., a Columbia, Md.-based company that commercialized the world’s first stem cell product, Osteocel, for bone regeneration. According to Mills, that product has brought a total of $1.5 billion in revenue to Osiris.

Under his leadership, in May 2012 Osiris received approval to market the world’s first systemically infused stem cell drug, Prochymal, which it developed to combat pediatric acute graft-versus-host disease. (It was approved in Canada but is also available in the U.S.; click here to read more.)

This condition occurs in patients receiving bone marrow transplants that reject the person and attack the body.

“Patients will literally peel out of their skin,” Dr. Mills said, describing the horrors of the condition. Patients with the condition have a life expectancy of only 87 days, he added.

With Prochymal, patients got better two-thirds of the time, he said.

Dr. Mills attributed Osiris’s success to its intense focus on patients.

“The board room is covered with pictures of our patients,” he said.

“That’s my mission with CIRM,” he continued. “We’re going to focus on the patients, and everything else is going to come along. If you get a sense of urgency from me, it’s because, if a life expectancy of a disease is 87 days, missing a month or two months or three months are actually real patients dying.”

Putting criticisms of CIRM in perspective

The stem cell board’s selection of a new CEO with long experience in the drug industry takes place a decade after California voters created CIRM by approving Proposition 71, the California Stem Cell Research and Cures Act.

According to CIRM’s statistics, so far four clinical trials directly funded by the organization have taken place – including an observational study of Huntington’s disease patients at the University of California, Davis, the basis for a potential CIRM-supported treatment trial envisioned by Dr. Vicki Wheelock and Dr. Jan Nolta (click here to read more).

Six additional trials for different conditions are based on “discoveries made by our grantees when they were carrying out CIRM-funded research,” CIRM reports (click here to read more).

According to Kevin McCormack, CIRM’s senior director for public communications and patient advocate outreach, five more directly funded trials for various diseases will start by the end of 2014.

CIRM’s efforts have not yet produced a drug, although one or more treatments could arise from the clinical trials.

Some in California have criticized CIRM’s performance. The San Francisco Chronicle, for instance, editorialized that CIRM “hasn’t lived up to its hype” and has compiled a “decidedly mixed” record, although it recognized that California voters had “outsize expectations when they passed Prop. 71.”

The Chronicle further noted that “it’s been a struggle to get the agency to use the best organizational practices. In 2012, a blue-ribbon committee of the National Academy of Sciences released a report after a yearlong review that found conflicts of interest on the CIRM board that threatened to ‘undermine respect for its decisions.’ It also found significant flaws in the agency’s grant-approval process.”

The editorial added: “Progress on stem cell research has been significant – but it’s been the progress of the tortoise rather than the hare.”

In general, news coverage of CIRM has been sporadic. After all, news outlets typically don’t report on the work of scientists in the trenches.

In this blog, I have provided frequent coverage of HD science as well as related stem cell research. In my 15 years writing about HD science, I’ve learned that scientific progress is slow by nature. It’s not just the CIRM projects that take a long time to produce results.

From my standpoint, stem cell science has produced a “growing array of possibilities” for treatments and the “potential for a new era in human health,” as I noted after attending the 2013 World Stem Cell Summit (click here to read more).

Producing treatments is also extremely expensive. According to Jim Greenwood, president and CEO of the Biotechnology Industry Association, which organized the Bio Convention, developing a new drug in the U.S. costs an average of $1.2 billion. CIRM and/or its affiliated researchers will need to partner with the pharmaceutical industry to bring treatments to market.

In the HD community, we earnestly hope for stem cell treatments, but we’re also aware that a “cocktail” of different approaches (like gene therapy) will likely be needed to deal with the complexities of the disease. We’re rooting for all the researchers to find keys to treatments.

Crucial experience with clinical trials

With the need to show results, it’s not surprising the CIRM board chose a new CEO from the business world.

As noted by David Jensen, author of the blog California Stem Cell Report, CIRM’s previous two presidents, Zach Hall, Ph.D., and Alan Trounson, Ph.D., came from “largely academic and non-business backgrounds…. Decisions are likely to come faster under Mills.”

In his introduction of Dr. Mills at the San Diego meeting, CIRM board chair Dr. Thomas said that the new CEO met the many qualifications sought by the organization, including familiarity with the process of running stem cell clinical trials and seeking approval of drugs from governmental agencies.

“Very few people can say they’ve had more experience in clinical trials in stem cells,” Dr. Thomas said. “Very few people can say they’ve had more experience with the regulators, not just from the U.S., but from other countries as well.”


Randy Mills (left) and CIRM board chair Jonathan Thomas (CIRM photo)

The board also sought someone familiar with CIRM. Dr. Mills has spent the last five years as a reviewer of proposals made to CIRM by stem cell researchers seeking funding. (Click here to read more.)

During the audience Q & A, one woman asked Dr. Mills what he would do to make the grant review process more “transparent.”

Recognizing that the process wasn’t “perfect,” Dr. Mills nevertheless said he believed it was “pretty good” and already “remarkably transparent,” with world experts involved in the reviews. He reminded the audience that no “divining rod” exists to pick perfect projects. He added that he will work for quicker approval of worthy applications.

Keeping CIRM running

Jeanne Loring, Ph.D., a leading expert on stem cells and Parkinson’s disease at The Scripps Research Institute in San Diego, wanted to know how Dr. Mills would prioritize CIRM spending from now through 2017, when the last of the agency’s grants will be made and the original CIRM allocation of $3 billion might run out.

The agency still has about $600 million in uncommitted funds. In all, $1.5 billion of its $3 billion budget has yet to be spent, as many budgeted projects remain in progress.

“Let’s be careful on speculating on when CIRM is going to run out of money,” Dr. Mills said in response to Dr. Loring’s question. “That (2017) would be the absolute earliest. This is an important thing for people to understand: in order for that date to be true, things have gone incredibly well. Everything we funded, 100 percent of it, has worked. If that ‘17 date happens, I’m a happy guy, because we are rattling off diseases left and right.”

Dr. Mills explained that CIRM does “milestone-based funding.”

So we’ll fund your project, but if you don’t hit your milestone, if it’s not working, we stop funding,” he continued. “That seems like a pretty good idea. So the projections on these running out of money is assuming that everything is going along. Everything’s going along, and we can’t get California to say, ‘Let’s keep doing it’? In a more practical sense, we’re not going to run out of money by then, and everything’s not going to work perfect. My job is to run CIRM as efficiently as we possibly can to develop treatments.”

According to spokesperson McCormack, the CIRM board can still redirect funding from the $1.5 billion as yet unspent. If a project comes in under budget, CIRM can also redirect savings to other projects, he added.

Some stem cell advocates such as Don Reed, who served on the executive board for the Prop 71 campaign, are already advocating a second round of CIRM funding to be requested from the state by way of another ballot proposition to be put before the voters. (You can watch Reed, HD advocate Judy Roberson, and children’s neurological disorders advocate Alex Richmond speak about their experiences by clicking here.)

Dr. Thomas has also spoken publicly about seeking private sources of funding for CIRM. In this vein, Dr. Mills’ experience in capital markets – one of the sought-for qualities in a CEO noted by Dr. Thomas – could prove helpful.

"California (undertook) a very important task in creating a funding stream for stem cell research," Clinton, referring to CIRM, said during her Q & A at the Bio Convention. "Other states have followed suit, when it looked as though the federal government would not be doing that. States have a role to play, but we need a national framework."

Our urgency for cures

Huntington’s disease advocates participated in the “Meet the New CIRM President” events in San Diego as well as Los Angeles and San Francisco.

One of those participants, veteran advocate Frances Saldaña of Orange County, sees Dr. Mills’ appointment as a positive step.

“I really liked Randy Mills,” Saldaña, a mother of three children stricken with juvenile HD, told me in an e-mail about her encounter with Dr. Mills at the June 10 Los Angeles meeting. “I feel that he really understands our urgency to find cures.”

Saldaña’s daughter Margie Hayes – who became one of the very first HD patients to advocate for CIRM support for Huntington’s stem cell research when she spoke at a December 2007 CIRM board meeting – succumbed to the disease on February 7. Hayes had just turned 44. She is survived by her husband Craig and two teenaged children.

Saldaña’s husband also died of HD, which has afflicted several other members of her extended family. She was recently presented the 2014 Living Our Values Award by Michael Drake, the chancellor of the University of California, Irvine (UCI), for her work in HD community service. Saldaña is the founder of HD-CARE, an Orange County care organization affiliated with UCI’s Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders.

Saldaña said of Dr. Mills: “In the case of HD families, he completely understands that we're in a race against time, as our families are dying.”


As mother Frances Saldaña (left) looks on, Margie Hayes tells about her struggle against HD at the CIRM Spotlight on Huntington's Disease, Los Angeles, December 12, 2007 (photo by Gene Veritas).

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

‘It’s really getting real’: payoffs in the effort to treat Huntington’s disease

The path to treating Huntington’s disease – a potential major breakthrough in the history of science and medicine – is becoming clearer.

That was the takeaway message from the Ninth Annual HD Therapeutics Conference, organized by the CHDI Foundation, Inc. and held February 24-27 at the Parker hotel in Palm Springs, CA. Spending tens of millions of dollars annually, CHDI is a non-profit, virtual biotech founded solely to discover HD treatments. Some 300 participants from academia, the pharmaceutical industry, and biotech firms took part, as well as a number of patient advocates, including Olympic rowing medalist Sarah Winckless, who delivered the keynote address.

“The tagline would have to be ‘it’s really getting real,’” said Robert Pacifici, Ph.D., the chief scientific officer for CHDI Management, Inc., in an interview with me at the conference. “What I’m seeing at this conference already is the culmination of very large, very long-term efforts – things that have taken years and thousands of person hours, patients’, caregivers’, researchers’, and physicians’ – finally coming together in ways that are really conclusive and really helpful.”

All that work has involved numerous questions about the disease and potential ways to treat it, Dr. Pacifici explained.

“All of those things sadly have an incredibly high attrition rate,” he observed. “The fact that we’re getting answers is the thing that makes me the most excited. Sadly, sometimes we don’t like the answer. Sometimes the answer is: ‘That doesn’t work.’ But that’s still very useful for researchers.”

Winnowing out the useless approaches allows researchers to “refocus our resources on something that we feel has a better chance of bearing fruit,” Dr. Pacifici said.

Sitting one evening with a group of CHDI researchers, I expressed the natural concern of the HD community – a concern sometimes tinged with impatience and frustration: could the rapidly expanding knowledge about HD result in an endless search for treatments fueled by questions that simply produce new questions rather than treatments?

They answered with an emphatic no. Echoing Dr. Pacifici, they said that real solutions were in the works.

The conference did seem more coherent in comparison with the previous three I had attended. Indeed, as one senior CHDI advisor observed in response to my observation, Huntington’s researchers now have an understandable “story to tell” about the disease and the research.

You can watch my interview with Dr. Pacifici in the video below. Just below the Pacifici interview, Portuguese speakers can watch my interview about the conference with Dr. Mônica Haddad of Brazil.



Confirming the shots on goal

Just three days before the conference, CHDI and Genzyme Corporation announced an agreement to jointly develop a “novel gene-silencing therapeutic for Huntington’s disease” using an adeno-associated virus, which does not cause disease, as a delivery system.

The venture expands CHDI and other research projects’ portfolio of potential treatments for HD, several of which are in the early stages of clinical trials or aim to begin trials soon.

In Dr. Pacifici’s words, the growing number of drug targets means there are more “shots on goal” in the quest for treatments.

CHDI is concentrating on “validating” (confirming) the targets to assure that as many potential remedies as possible have a chance of becoming effective, safe treatments, Dr. Pacifici explained.

“It’s important for any drug discovery organization, because when you select a target, that’s what underpins the rest of the (drug discovery) activity,” he said.

No organization has yet discovered how to validate targets “exactly,” he said. However, CHDI is especially working hard to insure that a “particular target is really tethered” to the HD disease process and not some other disease or process, he added.

“While nobody has the magic bullet there, it was really impressive to see the variety of approaches that were taken,” Dr. Pacifici said of the talks on target validation.

These included X. William Yang’s report on his latest research with transgenic HD mice, Ernest Fraenkel’s study of the impact of the mutant huntingtin gene at the molecular level, and CHDI scientist Jim Rosinski’s efforts to unify and interpret the totality of biological data on HD by employing a systems biology approach.

You can watch an excerpt from Dr. Fraenkel’s presentation, Dr. Rosinski’s full presentation, and most of the other talks by viewing my 2014 CHDI video album.

Finding a modifier gene, delaying onset

Jim Gusella, Ph.D., one of the lead discoverers of the HD gene in 1993, described the work of a large international team to find a so-called modifier gene, which might act as a trigger for the disease and affect the rate of progression.

Such a gene could also become the target of a treatment, Dr. Pacifici explained.

“Imagine coming up with a drug that can delay your age of onset by 30 years,” he said, referring to the wide variability in age of onset for people with the same degree of mutation. “That would be fabulous.”

The Gusella team’s search for the modifier gene points to “a couple of specific sites on human chromosomes,” Dr. Pacifici said. In contrast with the numerous studies done in mice and other organisms, this project “was generated with human data. So we don’t have to worry about the predictive value of those studies.”

Dr. Pacifici described the 20-year quest for the modifier gene as “a great example of how the community pulls together and the generosity of the families affects the progress of research. Without your blood, without your DNA sequences, without your permission, there’s no way these types of studies could be done.”

The team analyzed DNA from more than 4,000 HD gene carriers and affected individuals. The study also required the ongoing commitment of participants to allow researchers to track their symptoms.

“We need to make the correlation as to when the motoric age of onset (the start of involuntary movements) occurred,” Dr. Pacifici explained. “That’s invaluable and incredibly appreciated. Hopefully now people can understand why participation in trials like this leads to such exciting discoveries.”

New potential therapies

A session on “novel therapeutic approaches” focused on potential remedies different from the traditional concept of oral medication.

Jan Vesper, M.D., presented the promising results of his pilot trial using deep brain stimulation, which involves the placement in the brain of metal capsules covered with electrodes. Long-time HD specialist Gill Bates, Ph.D., discussed her new research on the muscle deterioration involved in HD mice and the potential use of a myostatin inhibitor to remedy the problem as well as perhaps ameliorate the involuntary movements typically suffered by patients.  Beth Stevens, Ph.D., explained the importance of restoring proper function of microglia (cells performing as the immune system of the nervous system) in pruning synapses, the connections between brain cells.

‘A horrible, lifelong case of jet lag’

Changes in people’s behavior could provide another way to ameliorate HD, Dr. Pacifici noted.

Along those lines, Christopher Colwell, Ph.D., presented critical new research on the circadian rhythm – our sleep clocks – and how its disrupted function in HD might worsen symptoms.

“Think of Huntington’s almost as a horrible, lifelong case of jet lag,” Dr. Pacifici said in describing the implications of Colwell’s and others’ work in this area. “By entraining (synchronizing) the clocks in your mind and the clocks in your various organs to stay in sync with each other – by using things like when you eat, when you go to sleep, when you exercise, what kind of light you’re exposed to – you could compensate for some of the mechanisms that go awry in Huntington’s disease. That type of regimen could be a therapy, or an add-on to a therapy, rather than something as traditional as a pill.”

Dr. Colwell’s engaging talk provided a wealth of ideas about the circadian rhythm and keeping it healthy. You can watch his presentation in the video below.


Alpar Lazar, Ph.D., Stephen Morairty, Ph.D., and Tom Warner, Ph.D., provided additional evidence about the importance of the sleep cycle.

Assuring the drug does its job

In the session on “huntingtin lowering biomarkers,” several presenters described cutting-edge techniques for measuring the efficacy of potential therapies designed to attack HD at its genetic roots and reduce the effects of the mutant huntingtin protein. Those projects include the above-mentioned CHDI-Genzyme venture and the Isis-Roche-CHDI partnership.

“What you’d like to do is make sure that after you administer one of those drugs, that the drug has done its job,” Dr. Pacifici explained. “We don’t want to wait for five years to measure hundreds of people only to find out that the drug never did its primary job, which was to lower huntingtin levels.”

Along with an expert task force, CHDI has developed a series of ways to determine huntingtin-lowering efficacy in humans within a period of weeks, he said.

“Because we want to know what’s going on in the human brain, and we can’t go in there and take a little chunk of brain out every couple of weeks, we have to figure out a way of non-invasively making those measurements,” Dr. Pacifici continued.

The techniques include quantitative EEG (a kind of brain mapping), magnetic resonances pectroscopy, assessment of dysfunction in the mitochondria (the powerhouses of the cell), and measurement of huntingtin in bodily fluids such as cerebral spinal fluid.

Scientists are developing ways to measure other types of potential HD remedies such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors (aka “Viagra for the brain”).

As the HD field moves towards clinical trials, CHDI has increasingly emphasized the need for the exchange of information between scientists in the lab and physicians and others focused on patients and clinical trials, Dr. Pacifici commented. Such teamwork will enhance the possibility of finding treatments, he said.

Supporting Enroll-HD

The conference also featured several activities promoting Enroll-HD.

First announced in 2010 and officially launched in 2012, the CHDI-sponsored Enroll-HD is building a worldwide registry of HD patients, HD gene carriers, untested at-risk individuals, family members, and volunteers. It aims to facilitate scientific understanding of HD, identify potential participants in clinical trials, and therefore speed the process of finding therapies.

In a pre-conference meeting of Enroll-HD physicians and administrators on February 23, participants focused on ways to use the project to improve patient care. On February 24, Enroll-HD’s international steering committee met to discuss administrative matters.

On February 25, the CHDI conference featured a practical lunchtime session that provided an update on program details like the number of participants.

A ‘matchmaker’ facilitating clinical trials

In order to deepen understanding of Huntington’s, Enroll-HD looks at individual and family histories of HD “over a long period of time,” Joe Giuliano, CHDI’s director of clinical operations and the chief Enroll-HD administrator, said in an interview on February 24.

“The vision for Enroll-HD is to provide a clinical research platform that can be used by the community of HD researchers around the world to do clinical studies, and it can be used by pharmaceutical sponsors to do clinical trials,” Giuliano explained. “It’s an enabling tool to help answer important questions about Huntington’s disease using clinical research.”

Giuliano described the program’s three levels: the international administration, the wide range of sites based in local communities (run by physicians and other health workers), and the HD families.

“It starts with families,” Giuliano said. “Enroll-HD is really a study for all the family to participate in.

“Enroll-HD is a great opportunity for us to come together as a global research community. The clinical trials that are going to lead ultimately to new therapies for Huntington’s disease are going to be conducted in global clinical trials…. The more people we can get in Enroll-HD, the more powerful the study can become, for example, for recruiting for clinical trials. Enroll-HD can help identify participants … who are eligible for clinical trials.”

This potential makes Enroll-HD “very attractive” for pharmaceutical companies to collaborate with the program, Giuliano said.

Enroll-HD is a “matchmaker” putting together researchers, patients, drug companies, and others, he continued.

Anybody in the HD community can participate, including unaffected relatives of HD people. “By joining Enroll-HD, you’re being very proactive in a lot of different ways,” he said. “You’re providing the possibility that you may be eligible for a future clinical trial.”

The larger the pool of potential participants, the faster trials can take place, he concluded.

You can watch my interview with Giuliano in the video below.

For other coverage of the conference, visit www.HDBuzz.net.

Coming soon: a detailed report and more videos on Enroll-HD.