Advocacy in the workplace: raising awareness about Huntington’s disease and brain health

In the fight to defeat Huntington’s disease and other brain disorders, advocacy in the workplace can attract new allies, boost awareness, and serve as a bridge to resources for those facing HD.

November 4 will mark five years since I went public about my gene-positive HD status in my essay “Racing Against the Genetic Clock,” published in The Chronicle of Higher Education.

Before that day in 2012, I lived in the “terrible and lonely HD closet,” with virtually nobody outside the HD community, family, and close friends aware of my family’s struggles. My name appeared nowhere in the local, tri-annual HD newsletter that I wrote and edited from 2001-2007. I began this blog in 2005 with a pseudonym, “Gene Veritas,” “the truth in my genes,” a reflection of my status as an HD-gene carrier.

Starting with the Chronicle article, I have integrated my advocacy into my work as a professor at the University of San Diego (USD).

Bioethical challenges

In 2014, I started collaborating with Laura Rivard, Ph.D., an adjunct professor in the USD Department of Biology who teaches a course on bioethics. One of her students, Nazin Sedehi, recorded a video interview of me recalling my family’s experiences with genetic testing for two websites aimed at helping a general audience explore bioethical dilemmas.

I’ve spoken on HD to Dr. Rivard’s class three times. In February 2016, I gave a presentation titled “Huntington’s Disease and Bioethics: A Personal Case Study.” The talk focused on how advances in medicine and biotechnology have provided new tools for understanding both human biology and the situation of HD-affected individuals and families.

“These changes – these huge transformations that we’ve been going through scientifically and socially – have put people in unprecedented predicaments and thus, they are creating new bioethical challenges,” I stated. I reflected on how HD families faced decisions about predictive testing, family planning, abortion, suicide, euthanasia, and more.

You can watch my presentation in the video below. During the other class sessions, I provided commentary and answered questions after we watched the HBO documentary The Lion’s Mouth Opens, about young filmmaker-actress Marianna Palka’s decision to get tested for HD.

Huntington's Disease and Bioethics: A Personal Case Study from Gene Veritas on Vimeo.

‘You are precious’

My advocacy reached a milestone in May, when I traveled with my family to Rome to help represent the U.S. HD community at HDdennomore: Pope Francis’ Special Audience with the Huntington’s Disease Community in Solidarity with South America. I reported on the audience in several blog posts (click here to read one example).

My trip was made possible by USD’s College of Arts and Sciences, the Frances G. Harpst Center for Catholic Thought and Culture (CCTC), the International Center, and the Department of History. Back home, on September 28 I gave a talk exploring the social, scientific, and religious meaning of this extraordinary event. Some 60 students, faculty, and members of the San Diego HD community attended.

In one of the most emotional speeches I have given, I repeated the words of Francis’ address that most moved me:

For Jesus, disease is never an obstacle to encountering people, but rather, the contrary. He taught us that the human person is always precious, always endowed with a dignity that nothing and no one can erase, not even disease. Fragility is not an ill. And disease, which is an expression of fragility, cannot and must not make us forget that in the eyes of God our value is always priceless. Disease can also be an opportunity for encounter, for sharing, for solidarity. The sick people who encountered Jesus were restored above all by this awareness. They felt they were listened to, respected, loved. May none of you ever feel you are alone; may none of you feel you are a burden; may no one feel the need to run away. You are precious in the eyes of God; you are precious in the eyes of the Church!

I told the audience: “I saw HD turn my mother into a shadow of herself. I deeply fear losing my ability to speak and, especially, to write. Hearing that we HD people are ‘precious’ was a huge morale booster.”

I hope that my presentation raises awareness about HD in the U.S. Catholic community and beyond, and helps spur at-risk individuals and others to exit the HD closet and join the movement.

You can watch the speech in the video below, recorded and edited by Scott Lundergan of USD media services.

'Hidden No More': Pope Francis' Historic Audience with the Huntington's Disease Community from Gene Veritas on Vimeo.

Warning about football’s dangers

On October 17, another dimension of my workplace advocacy – the effort to raise awareness at the university about the dangers of tackle football – reached a crescendo. A resolution to ban football at USD, proposed by Daniel Sheehan, Ph.D., Nadav Goldschmied, Ph.D., and me, was voted on in the Academic Assembly of the College of Arts and Sciences.

USD football is a non-scholarship sport, so its profile is not as high as at some campuses, but it has fervent fans among students, alumni, and even faculty. At a USD Faculty Senate meeting last December, President James T. Harris III, D.Ed., reaffirmed his opposition to cancelling the program because, in his words, “no universities have closed their football program […]  because of concussion evidence yet.”

In the weeks leading up to the meeting, I remembered Pope Francis’ encouragement. I also frequently recalled my mother’s struggle with HD and my father, the “HD warrior” who cared for her for more than a decade.

Our resolution focused on the scientific evidence about football’s threat to the brain, especially the disease known as CTE (chronic traumatic encephalopathy), first seen in boxers in the 1920s and, over the past ten years, identified in the autopsies of an increasing number of National Football League, college, and high school players. We cited the publication in July of an article in the Journal of the American Medical Association documenting CTE in 110 of 111 autopsies of decease NFL players. (For the resolution’s rationale, please click here).

CTE produces symptoms similar to HD and other neurological diseases such as aggressiveness and cognitive loss.

However, many faculty members defended the football program because of virtues such as character-building. Surprisingly, this group included biologists and other natural science specialists.

After one of the most heated faculty debates I have witnessed in 25 years at USD, the motion lost, 50-26. However, 30 professors abstained – reflecting perhaps discomfort about offending their colleagues and/or indecision on the matter.

As a brain health advocate, I was disturbed by the vote. In an upcoming article, I will explore the USD debate in detail, in particular how it shows how scientific evidence is often ignored or manipulated in critical debates, and what this means for the HD and other disease communities.

Immediately after the assembly, I met with about 70 members of USD’s chapter of Phi Delta Epsilon, the co-ed pre-medical fraternity, to speak on HD and the papal audience. I urged them, as future members of the health professions, to be aware of CTE and to safeguard the well-being of football players. I also defended the continued inclusion in our health system of those with pre-existing conditions like me who in the past often hid their potential illnesses.

Fraternity president Nicholas DiChristofano pledged that the organization would support the HD community.

A student stands up for her family

As a result of my public stance, USD faculty members, students, and former students have supported the cause with generous donations and participation in the annual Team Hope Walk of the San Diego Chapter of the Huntington’s Disease Society of America (HDSA). Many read this blog.

The Serbin Family Team of the 2014 HDSA-San Diego Team Hope Walk: from left to right, Dory Bertics, Bianca Serbin, Jane Rappoport, Gary Boggs, Prof. Yi Sun (of the USD History Department), Gene Veritas (aka Kenneth P. Serbin), Regina Serbin, and Allan Rappoport (photo by Bob Walker)

Through my advocacy, I can connect people to HDSA’s resources.

At day’s end on October 17, I met with Sydney Smyer, a 19-year-old USD biology major.

On October 3, Sydney had sent me the following email, quoted here with her permission:

My name is Sydney Smyer. I am a student here at USD and I attended your talk on Huntington’s disease and the explanation of His Holiness, Pope Francis’ involvement in the Huntington’s disease community. I was quite moved and enlightened, Dr. Serbin. Huntington’s disease runs in my family. My grandfather died from it as well as his father and three of his brothers. His remaining brother has recently been diagnosed with Huntington’s disease. Soon I will be tested, especially because my mother refuses to be tested and my uncle has been showing symptoms for some years now. I think your words would enlighten my family and bring them to the fullness and understanding that is comforting in so much uncertainty for our family members.

Sydney, whose family is Catholic, will share my #HDdennomore video with her family. They have an extremely rare disease known as HDL1, Huntington’s disease-like syndrome, a genetic disorder producing HD-like symptoms.

Sydney and I talked for almost an hour about our journeys with HD. Though I mentioned my own past fears about my HD status jeopardizing my career and insurance, Sydney was adamant about facing HDL1 openly and standing up for her family.

She accepted my invitation to the October 30 meeting of the HDSA-San Diego support group, featuring the highly popular annual HD research update by Jody Corey-Bloom, M.D., Ph.D., the director of the local HDSA Center of Excellence for Family Services and Research.

Stepping forward

To me, there is no more important work in the HD community than the mutual assistance we provide at the support group.

When I exited the HD closet five years ago, I did not imagine that one day a USD student would join our group.

I am grateful to USD and my colleagues for their support as the HD community seeks a treatment for this incurable disorder.

As a professor, I have the privilege of melding my academic work with advocacy.

However, many of us in the HD community have unique skills and positions with the potential for building bridges to our employers and others we associate with on personal and professional levels. Doing so can reap many unexpected benefits.

Sydney's courage should inspire us all to step forward.

Banning college football: an urgent objective for brain health advocates

As more than 100 million people get ready to watch the Super Bowl on February 5, I’d like to point to the increasing number of people who express deep concern over concussions and disabling brain injuries caused by tackle football.

Advocates for Huntington’s disease and other devastating neurological conditions share such concerns. I witnessed my mother’s ultimately fatal fight against HD, a brain disorder that manifests many of the symptoms experienced by football players who have sustained head injuries, including memory loss, aggressiveness, and suicidal tendencies.

Because I inherited the HD gene, I face the same fate.

I do not wish HD or anything like it on anybody.

I used to like watching football, especially because the San Diego Chargers supported the HD cause. But after the revelations about head injuries, I stopped watching because doing so contradicted my commitment to brain health. I will not tune in on Super Sunday.

Along with a growing number of scientists, brain health advocates, and athletes and their families, I’m disturbed by the traumatic effects of these injuries. This situation impacts not just the players, but their families, who must care for their loved ones as they watch them struggle with and even die from brain trauma.

As an HD advocate and college professor, I have become increasingly distressed that so many colleges and universities – including my employer, the University of San Diego (USD) – still prioritize the entertainment and community-building value of football over the clear risks to student athletes.

If institutions of higher education truly embody academic integrity and guard their students’ well-being, how can they allow football to continue? Are university administrators in denial about brain injuries, as were the executives of the National Football League (NFL)? How can they possibly allow students to take such a risk?

Highly paid NFL professionals now know what they face. In an admission some say echoes Big Tobacco’s recognition that smoking causes cancer and heart disease, in March 2016 the NFL finally acknowledged the link between football and CTE (chronic traumatic encephalopathy), a disabling brain disease first seen in boxers in the mid-twentieth century. Last December, the conclusion of the historic concussion lawsuit against the NFL paved the way to potentially distribute up to $1 billion to as many as 20,000-plus (!) former players.

College players are not professionals, although many coaches and athletic programs treat them as such, albeit without compensation. They are students. Colleges are not businesses. They are institutions of learning. They should not expose students to the possibility of CTE, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, Lou Gehrig’s disease, and the other disorders caused by concussions and the numerous sub-concussive hits to the head that occur in a football game.

Unnecessary risks

Since November 2013, I have advocated at USD for player safety in light of the revelations about concussions and brain trauma (click here to read more). Other faculty members are also troubled by the risk to student health.

With the mounting scientific evidence about the dangers of football, Professor Daniel Sheehan, Associate Professor Nadav Goldschmied, and I (Gene Veritas, aka Kenneth P. Serbin) have proposed a resolution for the February 7 meeting of the Academic Assembly of the College of Arts and Sciences strongly urging that “the USD football program be terminated immediately.”

We know some consider this premature, or would call us killjoys. But we can’t ignore such a serious threat to student health.

“Knowingly putting our athletes at such risk is not consonant with the mission of the University,” the proposed measure states. “Putting athletes at unnecessary risk puts the University in significant legal and financial jeopardy.”

Last November 17, Prof. Goldschmied advocated for the resolution at an informal College of Arts and Sciences gathering where professors made brief presentations of their research and other activities. Referring to USD’s promotional campaign as a “changemaker” university, he titled his talk “Changemakers? Why USD Football Should be Banned.”

“We advertise ourselves as ‘changemakers,’” he stated. “The question is: are we going to follow, or are we going to lead in what we do with our football program?” He received enthusiastic applause.

Prof. Goldschmied said that he had met with USD President James T. Harris III, D.Ed. to recommend the football ban. Dr. Harris declined to institute a ban, stating that the university would reevaluate as further data about football injuries becomes available.

“And I suggested, how about we do it the opposite way?” Prof. Goldschmied said. “Let’s cancel football and, if the data is promising, we will reinstate it.”

Dr. Harris reaffirmed his opposition to cancelling football at a December 8 USD Faculty Senate meeting. According to Senate minutes, he stated: “No universities have closed their football program in the last decade because of concussion evidence yet. It is a complicated issue. We have a successful and a good program. The answer is no but always open to more data and

concussion information.”

Dr. Harris cited other factors for his refusal such as the team’s excellent graduation rate (higher than the university’s overall rate); football’s ability to attract male students (USD has a majority of women); and improvements in USD’s athletic program’s concussion protocols and concussion education. Of course, college presidents must also deal with pushback from alumni, boards of trustees, and fans.

You can watch Prof. Goldschmied’s presentation in the video below.

Changemakers? Why USD Football Should be Banned from Gene Veritas on Vimeo.

Like crashing a car into a wall

As pointed out by researchers, football’s unique danger lays in the fact that it includes subconcussive hits, which don’t rise to the level of a concussion but can compound trauma. While a player might not suffer an in-game concussion, which would get him off the field, he can sustain dozens of the smaller hits.

On January 9, the day Alabama and Clemson played in the college national championship, the New York Times posted a highly telling report illustrating what happens to a football player’s brain from both big and small hits. As a video in the report demonstrates, these hits affect the deepest recesses of the brain.

The article presented data on one lineman’s hits to the head – a total of 62 (!) – while blocking during a single game. The hits had an average force roughly the equivalent to the player crashing a car into a wall at 30 m.p.h. (Click here for the article.)

Given this kind of evidence, it is alarming that football remains a sport at any educational level.

Bo Jackson, the only man to be a baseball All-Star and football Pro Bowler, stated in an interview this month that he would not have played football had he known about the risks of CTE.

“We’re so much more educated on this CTE stuff, there’s no way I would ever allow my kids to play football today,” Jackson said.

A powerful message

As one USD faculty member observed, ending the school’s football program would send a powerful message to other educational institutions, perhaps helping prompt cancellation of college football across the country.

Instead of becoming a “Notre Dame of the West,” as some have suggested, USD, a Catholic institution, could uniquely project itself as a moral and intellectual leader.

Those of us in the Huntington’s, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and numerous other neurological disease communities know all too painfully the vulnerability of the brain, the immense caregiving cost to families and society, and the suffering of the afflicted.

By joining the cause to protect college students from brain trauma, we can reinforce overall support for brain health and neurological research and funding.

In the final analysis, we are protecting our – and college students’ – most important natural resource: our brains.

It’s playoff time – and a reminder that brain health comes first

During the winter holidays, many Americans celebrate our culture of competition by watching football – from state high school championships to college bowl games to the National Football League (NFL) series culminating in the Super Bowl.

However, recent news regarding head injuries has spurred the greatest concerns about player safety in the recent history of the game.

As I wrote last January on the eve of the 2013 Super Bowl, “the negative consequences of football on the brain have come under intense scrutiny.”

I noted that Junior Seau, the former San Diego Charger who had committed suicide in 2012, suffered from CTE (chronic traumatic encephalopathy), a brain disease produced by trauma to the head. According to Seau’s relatives, his behavior included depression, wild mood swings, forgetfulness, irrationality, and insomnia – symptoms noted in other players who have sustained brain injuries.

These symptoms are very similar to those seen in neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, Lou Gehrig’s, and Huntington’s disease, which claimed my mother’s life.

I carry the mutated gene that causes HD but have so far escaped its inevitable, terrible symptoms.

Today I turn 54, an age at which my mother had already begun a steep decline. Birthdays always make me introspective and retrospective, and as I draw to a close an especially intense year in HD advocacy, professional work, and family life, I feel a special need to reflect on my concerns about HD and CTE while waxing nostalgic and a bit autobiographical.

CTE, the NFL, and a ‘public health crisis’

In August, one week before the start of the NFL season, the league settled a lawsuit brought by some 6,000 former players and families who accused the league of hiding the connection between football and concussions. The NFL agreed to pay the players $765 million and was expected to pay an additional $200 million in legal fees.

However, the settlement did not require the NFL to admit any wrongdoing, nor did it state any conclusions about football and brain injuries.

With a dispute emerging over legal fees, the federal judge overseeing the case has yet to approve the settlement.  New lawsuits filed since the settlement have increased the likelihood that the concussion issue will enter a courtroom (click here to read more).

In August, ESPN (Entertainment and Sports Programming Network) abruptly ended its relationship with the PBS (Public Broadcasting System) documentary program Frontline, reportedly because of pressure from the NFL regarding an upcoming documentary.

Nevertheless, in collaboration with two ESPN-based investigative journalists, Frontline in October aired a two-hour report titled “League of Denial,” revealing the NFL’s attempts to hide the seriousness of brain injuries from the players and the public even as physicians studying concussions found CTE in the autopsied brains of dozens of deceased players.

In early November, it was reported that several former NFL players were diagnosed with CTE. They were the first living players to undergo a new kind of brain scan capable of detecting signs of CTE.

Days later, two former college football players filed a federal lawsuit against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), claiming it failed to inform players about the risks of concussions and demanding medical monitoring for former players.

Meanwhile, news organizations reported that Pop Warner, the nation’s largest youth football program, registered a nearly ten percent drop in participation between 2010 and 2012. That suggesets the general public had taken strong note of the dangers of football.

“There has never been anything like it in the history of modern sports: a public health crisis that emerged from the playing fields of our 21st-century pastime,” wrote the ESPN journalists, Mark Fainauru-Wada and Steve Fainuru, in an excerpt from their book League of Denial: The NFL, Concussions, and the Battle for Truth. “A small group of research scientists put football under a microscope – literally…. What the researchers were saying was that the essence of football – the unavoidable head banging that occurs on every play, like a woodpecker jackhammering at a tree – can unleash a cascading series of neurological events that in the end strangles your brain, leaving you unrecognizable.”

Common problems and goals

I am struck by the similarities between HD and what scientists, physicians, and former players have described as the symptoms of CTE. HD effaced my mother’s ability to speak and interact with others, leaving her a mere shadow of herself.

I fear the same fate.

As an HD advocate, I believe the neurological disease communities, as well as victims of stroke and traumatic brain injuries from military combat or other situations, should support the efforts to research the causes and symptoms of CTE and support those afflicted by it. Research on these various conditions is mutually beneficial. We’re all part of a larger quest for improved brain health.

Like HD, CTE involves our most important natural resource: our brains. The brain controls all that we do. It makes us individuals and provides us with enormous capacities.

Conditions such as HD and CTE can put a huge emotional, medical, and financial burden on families and caregivers. We need to find ways to prevent, treat, or cure these conditions as quickly as possible.

Advocacy in the workplace

In November, I brought my advocacy into the workplace.

When the University of San Diego (USD), where I chair the history department, announced its voluntary withdrawal from postseason football competition while it investigates a potential violation of rules regarding financial aid and athletic recruitment, I urged the administration to also conduct a review of player safety in light of the revelations about CTE.

My e-mail message led to a constructive dialogue with the athletic director, the NCAA faculty representative, and others to seek ways in which USD, fulfilling its mission of education and social justice, can inform the campus and the local community on the issue of CTE and brain health.

I hope to report progress on these efforts in the coming months.

The larger implications of sports

I have long cultivated an interest in the social, historical, and health-related implications of sports.

During my freshman year at Yale University, I helped support myself by working ten hours per week as an assistant public relations person in the university’s sports information office. I also reported and wrote columns for the Yale Daily News. One of my articles described my experience as one of the first – if not the ­first – male reporters to enter a female locker room.

In another article, a quotation from Yale’s athletic trainer, Al Battipaglia, summed up my own current philosophy about student athletics: “Vince Lombardi said winning is the only thing. Al Battipaglia recites the athletic trainer’s prayer: ‘It’s not if we win or lose, but if nobody gets hurt.’”

At the time, Yale had an extremely cautious, automatic ten-day suspension for any athlete with a head injury.

At Yale I also had the privilege of studying in a seminar on the “American sports syndrome” directed by ABC Sports broadcaster Howard Cosell, one of the most trenchant sports commentators of the 20^th century. Cosell taught us about the contradictions and hypocrisy involved in the world of sports.

Brazil, soccer, and the ‘opiate of the people’

Later, I had far less time to follow American sports as I pursued a career as historian of Brazil, with a specialization in the history of the Brazilian Catholic Church, dictatorship, human rights, and reproductive issues. Throughout much of the 1980s and 1990s, I paid more attention to soccer.

Serious injuries occur in soccer, and fan devotion and violence make our Super Bowl craze seem mild in comparison.

In the past, some political leaders have used soccer as an “opiate of the people” to manipulate the masses. This year millions of Brazilians protested in the streets against their leaders, in part because they were angry over the billions of dollars in government spending on stadia for the 2014 World Cup while public transportation and the health and educational systems remain substandard for much of the populace.

Nevertheless, in terms of the sport itself, I consider soccer as a more graceful and civilized activity when compared to the brutality of football.

Uneasy about football

Starting in the early 2000s, HD rekindled my interest in pro football, thanks to the Chargers’ commitment to the Huntington’s cause.

However, as I’ve reflected on the devastation that disease and trauma can cause in the brain, I’ve become increasingly uneasy about watching football games.

The Frontline documentary “changed forever how I will watch a professional football game – if, indeed, I can bring myself to do so again,” I wrote in my USD e-mail message.

Tracking CTE

My HD advocacy has led me to expand into the history of science, technology, and medicine. Now, with my added concern about athletes and CTE, I will add yet another layer to my advocacy, using my skills as a historian and former journalist.

I aim to track significant news reports about CTE. (Frontline has set up a “concussion watch” of officially reported NFL head injuries. So far this year it has registered 146 incidents.)

I will also monitor the continuing debate about whether football head injuries cause the condition. One worthwhile, in-depth debate about “League of Denial” took place in a published e-mail exchange between journalist Daniel Engber of Slate and author Stefan Fatsis (click here to read more).

Science and risks of CTE

As I’ve learned so well from the Huntington’s movement, effective advocacy requires understanding scientific research. Therefore, I also aim to track the science of CTE.

A number of reports and academic articles on CTE have appeared in the last few years.

The National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke, a division of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), issued a brief report on its December 2012 workshop on the neuropathology of CTE. The report raised more questions than it answered, demonstrating the infancy of research on CTE and outlining a plan for sustained, coordinated research on the condition.

(In August 2013 the NFL donated $30 million to the NIH for research on CTE and other medical conditions affecting athletes.)

Other articles have warned of the potential risks of sustaining brain injuries in contact sports.

“Symptoms of CTE may begin years or decades (after one or multiple concussions) and include a progressive decline of memory, as well as depression, poor impulse control, suicidal behavior, and, eventually, dementia similar to Alzheimer’s disease,” one article states. “Given the millions of athletes participating in contact sports that involve repetitive brain trauma, CTE represents an important public health issue.… It is now known that those instances of mild concussion or ‘dings’ that we may have previously not noticed could very well be causing progressive neurodegenerative damage to a player’s brain.”

Another article outlined the history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and its relationship to neurological decline, including cases of CTE. “The best data indicate that moderate and severe TBIs increase risk of dementia between 2-and 4-fold,” the authors concluded. “It is less clear whether mild TBIs such as brief concussions result in increased dementia risk, in part because mild head injuries are often not well documented and retrospective studies have recall bias.”

Autopsies of six Canadian Football League players with histories of concussions and neurological problems showed that three had CTE, while the others had Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and Lou Gehrig’s.

Skeptics, the media, and future goals

Some scientists have expressed skepticism about the research on CTE so far.

The latest and most prominent example appeared in a special issue of Neuropsychology Review, published in November and consisting of six articles by a “distinguished panel” of scientists and also an editorial, all on the topic of sports-related concussions.

“One cannot deny that boxing and other contact sports can potentially result in some type of injury to the brain,” the two authors of one article conclude. “There currently are no carefully controlled data, however, to indicate a definitive association between sport-related concussion and increased risk for late-life cognitive and neuropsychiatric impairment of any form.”

While agreeing that CTE is an “important public health concern,” the journal’s editorial highlights the problem of the divide “between media and evidence-based accounts of sports concussion.”

While the Frontline documentary took a positive step in informing the public, it also illustrated a stark societal imbalance.

As the documentary contrasted a scene showing thousands of journalists attending an official 2013 Super Bowl pre-game media event with the handful of reporters who covered a press conference where scientists presented evidence on CTE, it’s painfully evident that sports coverage remains largely an act of cheerleading rather than skeptical journalism.

Further, sports sections of daily newspapers routinely give footnote status to most news about athletes’ injuries. Such coverage focuses on the injury as a factor in a team’s success and rarely in terms of the athlete’s long-term health.

Although the scientific articles referenced here (as well as others) differ in perspective and conclusions, one fact is clear: more research is needed, because the number of case studies of CTE still remains quite small.

A playoff party and nagging concerns

I must admit that, even after keeping the TV and radio off most of this NFL season, I listened with excitement to last Sunday’s radio broadcast of the Chargers’ overtime victory, which, against enormous odds, secured the team a spot in the postseason quest for the Super Bowl.

My family and I are planning a Chargers playoff brunch and mini-party for next Sunday morning, when the team plays in the first round against the Bengals in Cincinnati. We’re inviting friends who, like us, know the devastation of Huntington’s disease – and the Chargers’ many contributions to the HD cause.

I’m sure we’ll all root for the Chargers.

However, we’ll also be crossing our fingers that nobody suffers a concussion or any other serious injury.

Personally, I’m torn between participating in a cultural ritual and standing up for my position as an advocate for brain health.

It’s playoff time – but also time to think of how we can all make the world a better and healthier place in the New Year.

For me, that includes resuming my role as an advocate for brain health and, with the rest of the neurological and genetic disease communities, imagining a world in which CTE, HD, and other similar disorders can be fully treated and, even better, prevented.