Showing posts with label vaccine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vaccine. Show all posts

Thursday, February 25, 2021

Getting the COVID-19 vaccine and a new exercise bike to keep stable in the fight against Huntington’s disease

 

In my fight against Huntington’s disease, I have strived to delay the inevitable onset by working hard to keep my overall health stable. This strategy has included avoiding potential shocks to my system.

 

Now the leading cause of death in the United States, COVID-19 poses a threat to all of us. As a 61-year-old HD asymptomatic gene carrier, I have religiously followed recommendations on social distancing, mask use, and handwashing.

 

As a university professor, I have taught online since March 2020. The pandemic has rocked universities’ finances and employees’ benefits. Despite serious precautions by the schools, the coronavirus has surged among some students, including at my campus, the University of San Diego.

 

On February 6, I got a last-minute opportunity to get vaccinated with the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. A San Diego nonprofit clinic that was following guidelines to first vaccinate individuals 65 and over announced around midday that not enough people from that group had responded, thus making available extra doses that needed to be injected that day. Educators and healthcare workers were invited to get that first of two doses.

 

My wife Regina, an instructional coordinator for the San Diego Unified School District, and I jumped at the chance. After a two-hour wait, including filling out forms and questionnaires, we received our shots! We were jubilant. Getting vaccinated also felt like an extra gift for Regina: February 6 was her birthday.

 

 

Gene Veritas, aka Kenneth P. Serbin, receiving an injection of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine (selfie by Gene Veritas)

 

As one of the tens of millions of Americans now at least partially vaccinated, I am protecting not only my health, but also limiting the spread of the pandemic. (For an expert discussion of the ethics of COVID-19 vaccination, including the phenomenon of “vaccine guilt,” click here.)

 

I was also proud to get the Moderna vaccine because its RNA-based approach resembles some of the treatment strategies being tried in HD clinical trial programs. Furthermore, the scientist-written HDBuzz website has urged HD-affected individuals to get vaccinated for COVID-19.

 

Though I had a sore arm and felt a queasy for a couple of days, I have felt normal since. We are scheduled to get the required second shot on March 6. I also have participated voluntarily in the federal government’s V-safe After Vaccination Health Checker, a mobile phone app including questions about pain and other potential side effects.

 

An innovative, ‘neurobic’ spin bike

 

Four days after our COVID shots, technicians delivered and set up our long-awaited new exercise machine, the Peloton Bike+, which has a screen for watching online classes.

 

Regina and I have always prioritized exercise. This has become ever more important as we have aged. When we had a backyard pool built in 2009, I insisted on installing a Fastlane swim device so that I could exercise vigorously.

 

I have varied my exercise – swimming, walking, riding a stationary bike – to focus on different parts of the body.

 

In general, avoiding physical and mental routine can reinforce brain and overall health. This has led me to practice “neurobics,” a word that combines words “neurons” and “aerobics.” Such brain workouts can include something as simple as engaging with interesting people or taking a different route every time I walk. Neurobics can increase levels of the critical brain nutrient BDNF, brain derived neurotrophic factor. (Click here to read more.)

 

After the start of the pandemic, we noted the extensive TV advertising for Peloton (which even became the subject of a recent Saturday Night Live skit poking fun at the motivational online workouts).

 

The Peloton bike and other online exercise apps that feature live and recorded exercise classes are an innovative, neurobic way of connecting with coaches and others. Users can expand their physical and mental horizons with the wide variety of online cycling classes, strength exercises, stretch classes, yoga, and other activities.

 

 

Gene Veritas riding the Peloton Bike+ (photo by Regina Serbin)

 

We have found the Peloton Bike+ and the app to be far superior to our previous exercise bike, which had begun to deteriorate. A spin bike, the Peloton allows for a more versatile workout.

 

In the psychologically devastating social isolation of the pandemic, the Peloton is also allowing us to thrive indoors. Despite a significant sticker price, the bike makes sense budget-wise, since the money from Regina’s cancelled gym membership goes to a monthly payment plan.

 

Subtle impairments predate onset

 

On February 16, I received a stark reminder of how Huntington’s disease can impair gene carriers, however slightly, in the years leading up to an actual clinical diagnosis.

 

I attended an online presentation by Paul Gilbert, Ph.D., a professor and the chair in the Department of Psychology at San Diego State University, to the University of San Diego Neuro and Psych Research Club. Titled “Neuropsychological Changes in the Premanifest and Manifest Stages of Huntington’s Disease,” Dr. Gilbert’s talk highlighted some of the key findings in his ongoing research on this topic, including data from a 2020 article by his team in the journal Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology.

 

Premanifest HD involves the period before a neurologist can actually observe a gene carrier as having experienced the onset of the disorder’s typical motor, cognitive, and/or behavioral symptoms, stated Dr. Gilbert. In the past, physicians only saw the motor symptoms – involuntary movements and unstable gait, for example – as signs of the malady

 

Using verbal learning and memory tests, the research has demonstrated that these individuals can develop subtle cognitive symptoms – in particular, memory loss – ten to fifteen years before the formal diagnosis, Dr. Gilbert explained. The memory deficits increase dramatically after HD onset, he added.

 

“It really argues that we as clinicians need to be looking at not just the motor symptoms to make a diagnosis of Huntington's disease, but really starting to look at cognitive symptoms,” Dr. Gilbert asserted.

 

That position echoes the general trend towards a view of Huntington’s as a multi-symptom disease over the past several decades.

 

Statistical versus clinical signs

 

As a regular participant in research studies, I have performed a number of the tests that Dr. Gilbert described.

 

During the Q&A, noting that gene carriers like me worry about where we stand on the road to onset, I asked Dr. Gilbert whether the premanifest impairments hamper “actual functioning,” for example, daily activities such as driving, balancing a checkbook, and communicating with others.

 

“They’re statistically impaired, but they’re not clinically impaired,” Dr. Gilbert observed about the gene carriers in the research studies. The deficits are “very subtle” and can only be picked up on testing, he added.

 

Nevertheless, he added that his research has also determined that subtle memory impairment does have a “measurable but quite mild” impact on activities like handling finances or taking medications, but that only after onset does the disease seriously interfere with daily living.

 

(Dr. Gilbert’s work also echoes the recent landmark study of young HD gene carriers, ranging in age from 18-40 and illustrating no significant cognitive of psychiatric decline. Click here to watch Dr. Gilbert’s 2018 presentation on HD to University of San Diego students.)

 

Anticipating a brighter future

 

With the pandemic and the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, I am very fortunate to have a job and work remotely.

 

Because an estimated 20 percent of HD onset results from non-genetic factors, my imminent protection from COVID-19 and anticipation of new neurobic adventures with the Peloton can help me maintain stable health.

 

They certainly have helped me to feel optimistic about the future – for the first time in a year. I am also looking forward to news on the key HD clinical trials in progress.

 

Although we recognize the long-term social impact of the pandemic, Regina and I are especially looking forward to a healthier and happier 2022 for all, and the chance to travel: we hope to attend my 40th college reunion, celebrate our 30th wedding anniversary, and watch our HD-free daughter Bianca graduate from college.

 

We are thankful for every moment of life.

Sunday, November 22, 2020

Happy Thanksgiving! And hail to the pharmaceutical and biotech industries – and the scientists!


Thanksgiving this year is going to be radically different for many Americans, including my family.

 

I will celebrate my favorite holiday just with my wife Regina, home in San Diego.

 

As it has for many Americans, the COVID-19 pandemic has prevented us from hosting our usual small group of friends.

 

After eating a healthy brunch, we plan to have a Zoom call with our HD-free “miracle” daughter Bianca, a junior history major at the University of Pennsylvania. We are ever thankful that Bianca did not have to face the devastating possibility of juvenile HD. We will miss her, but are reassured knowing that she will spend the day with her boyfriend and his immediate family in the East.

 

We also hope to Zoom with some of our local friends. 

 

However, despite the terrible pall cast by the pandemic over the 2020 holiday season, I feel extremely optimistic that researchers will find a highly effective vaccine for the coronavirus.

 

The announcements of preliminary data by Moderna and the team of Pfizer and BioNTech revealed that their vaccine candidates reduced COVID-19 infections by 95 percent in clinical trials.

 

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institutes of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), described the Moderna data as “stunningly impressive,” noting that he would have settled for 70-75 percent efficacy in a vaccine.

 

“It is really a spectacular result that I don’t think anybody had anticipated would be this good,” Dr. Fauci said. He had similar praise for the Pfizer/BioNTech data.

 

Both of these trials use genetic approaches: they introduce the virus’s own genes into cells to provoke an immune response.

 

According to the New York Times’ Coronavirus Vaccine Tracker, several dozen other companies have embarked on clinical trial programs using some form of approach based on genetics or other cutting-edge strategies. Only ten projects are making vaccines using the traditional approach of injecting weakened or dead coronaviruses.

 

In all, scientists are testing 54 vaccines in clinical trials, and at least 87 more are under investigation in animals.

 

Genetics-based approaches are familiar to the HD community, where researchers have investigated the potential of gene silencing drugs for more than a decade. Researchers in the lead program, Roche’s historic GENERATION HD1 Phase 3 clinical trial, hope to analyze data in 2022. 

 

When I heard of the initial reports of Moderna’s genetics-based approach, I felt deeply confident that humanity would ultimately defeat the coronavirus. 

 

The potentially record speed in getting a vaccine to the world is testimony to the ingenuity, dedication, and focus of the biotech and pharmaceutical industries, which I have observed with deep interest in my nearly quarter century as an HD advocate and student of the science – and as a writer summarizing the science in simple terms.

 

In October, posting on Facebook an article on the bold Triplet Therapeutics clinical trial program – yet another genetics-based effort – I wrote the following: “Hail to the many imaginative and hard-working companies in America’s pharmaceutical industry!”

 

I also salute the scientists involved, and the many pharmaceutical and biotech firms of other nations engaged in the fight against COVID-19 and HD.

 

Also, we must not forget the millions of doctors, nurses, and other healthcare workers and first responders who have heroically attempted to hold the line against COVID-19, thus giving the researchers the time necessary to develop the vaccines.

 

Thanksgiving is our quintessential American holiday. This year, with the pandemic, it takes on a global significance. Across all cultures and nations, the virus has led us to realize once again our common humanity – and the collective efforts needed to safeguard life for all.

 

 

Photo by Bianca Serbin, taken in fall 2009 at the San Diego Botanic Garden (click here to read more).

Thursday, May 21, 2020

In the pandemic, we need to rediscover patience and grasp our responsibility


In this time of pandemic, the virtue of patience is paramount. So is the need to grasp our impact on the history of the planet and its effect on our lives. We who are afflicted with rare diseases have already had to learn many hard life lessons, which apply to the vital efforts to confront the coronavirus. 

As we mark Huntington’s Disease Awareness Month, we recall how many in the HD and other neurological and rare disease communities have demonstrated great fortitude and also patience as we await effective treatments. Since learning of my mother’s diagnosis with HD in 1995 and my positive test for the mutation in 1999, I have worried about the inevitable onset of symptoms and yearned for a successful clinical trial to produce a drug to stave off the disease or ameliorate it.

“HD warriors” like my mother and caregiver father (both deceased) have had to confront the disease on a daily basis for a decade or longer. 

Drugs like tominersen, the gene-silencing compound now in a historical Phase 3 clinical trial run by Roche, require painstaking development and often well over a decade to reach the market.

The tominersen project began in 2007, and Roche expects to analyze Phase 3 data in 2022. (Tominersen was previously known as RG6042 and, before that, as IONIS-HTTRx.)

The best-case scenarios for an effective and safe COVID-19 vaccine for the general public point to some time in 2021. 

“What people don’t realize is that normally vaccine development takes many years, sometimes decades,” Dan Barouch, M.D., a virologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, stated in a news report. “And so trying to compress the whole vaccine process into 12 to 18 months is really unheard-of.”

A vaccine might never be found; after decades of intense research, science still has not developed one for AIDS.

Drug development requires precision and patience.

Possible hope from new drug development approaches

That said, by dint of biomedical progress (but lacking overall preparedness for a pandemic), the current worldwide effort could take place more rapidly than previous drug-development work.

With positive results in the very early stage of its vaccine program, drug maker Moderna, Inc., is using an RNA-based approach to attempt to block the actions of the coronavirus.

Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the developer of tominersen, is also looking into ways its drug technology “could benefit COVID-19 patients, first by looking at our existing pipeline to see if any clinical or preclinical drugs would have a use in treatment in either the disease, or more likely the complications of the disease arising from the acute respiratory syndrome,” Eric Swayze, Ph.D., the firm’s senior vice president of research, wrote in an e-mail to me on May 8. Ionis designs drugs using antisense oligonucleotides (artificial strands of DNA), a form of gene silencing technology.

“In the 2002/2003 SARS epidemic we did done some work with ASOs targeting both the coronavirus itself as well as host factors, and had preliminary hints of activity [effect],” Swayze added. “Because of this, we are making newer generation ASOs targeted to the SARS-CoV-2 [COVID-19] virus as well as host factors that contribute to the infection and disease. 

“We plan to work with collaborators who have the capability to test our lead ASOs in virus cultures. We believe that our recent pulmonary program advances position us to quickly move forward, provided that our drugs look promising. However, we feel this remains a high-risk discovery project, with many challenges ahead.”

Behind the reaction against lockdowns

However, despite the need for a long-term fight against COVID-19, only a few weeks after lockdowns began, tiny groups of purported “protestors” appeared demanding to “open up” states. They were egged on by President Donald Trump, who has declined to marshal national resources against the virus, and organized by conservative groups.

I have wondered: What if Americans had wanted to give up only three weeks after the 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor?

The initial impatience about COVID-19 was clearly politically motivated. Since then, some criticism of lockdowns results from growing economic hardship: with a 14.7 percent unemployment rate, the U.S. has lost the greatest number of jobs since the Great Depression of the 1930s. In addition, many small business owners have had to curtail their work or even shut down completely.

The pain hits professors and students

The economic pain has hit American universities such as my employer, the University of San Diego (USD), which switched to remote, online instruction in mid-March. Confronting an unexpected deficit, the president has announced a 50 percent cut in retirement benefits and a salary and hiring freeze.

There is no consensus nationally on how to resume classes in the fall, with leaders of different campuses struggling with uncertainty. The nation’s largest public university, California State University, for example, has announced, that its campuses will move nearly all instruction online.

With USD’s dependence on tuition for institutional survival and its reputation for high-quality instruction in relatively small classes in small classrooms, the administration has launched a still inchoate plan to reopen for the fall semester early, in mid-August. According to administrators, because of the loss in student fees, going remote again would extend losses by tens of millions of dollars, forcing possible layoffs and furloughs of some instructors and employees, an increased teaching load for the main faculty, and other types of cutbacks.

Many professors, including myself, fear returning to campus so soon; in normal times, packed dorms, classrooms, and other facilities (and student parties administrators can’t control) provide ideal conditions for a virus to spread. Though young people are less likely to suffer from coronavirus symptoms, some do get serious cases, and asymptomatic people can of course spread the virus to others more vulnerable.

Universities and their employees will seek to implement social distancing, testing for COVID-19, and other measures. Ultimately, depending on the course of the pandemic, many might have to resort again to remote learning.

We cannot return to ‘normal’

In fact, three in four Americans have supported social distancing and wearing masks.

Without good health, we are restricted economically, as the HD community knows so well.

I believe that the impatience comes in part from our culture of instant gratification, epitomized by online shopping and overnight delivery. Another part relates to political orientation, with Republicans favoring a more rapid opening than Democrats (for one analysis, click here).

I think many people – myself included – wrongly thought that, after a month or two of lockdown, we would return to “normal.”

However, as New York Governor  Andrew Cuomo put it on April 1, “I don’t think we get back to normal. We get to a new normal.” As a result of the crisis, society will undergo a “transformation,” and we must assure that it be “positive and not negative,” Cuomo urged.

“I fear that the resumption of normality would signal a failure to learn,” commented Pulitzer-Prize-winning medical writer Siddhartha Mukherjee, M.D. “We need to think not about resumption but about revision.”

He added, with reference to how the drive for instant success has exacerbated the pain of the pandemic: “To what extent did the market-driven, efficiency-obsessed culture of hospital administration contribute to the crisis?”

The perspective of Big History

Cuomo echoed the point that professional historians like me make to students and readers of our books: history is ever-changing, often with great progress, but also devastating setbacks, including world wars, plagues, and inhumane practices like slavery.

I teach a course called “Big History: From Cosmos to Cannibals,” which begins with the start of the universe and ends with the dawn of the modern era: Europeans' conquest of the Americas, beginning in the late 1400s and quickly causing epidemics of Old World diseases in which tens of millions of native Americans died in the hemisphere – a very poignant point of comparison with the pandemic this past semester. A field that has emerged recently, Big History embraces the idea that human development must be understood in the context of physics, biology, evolution, and the transition from small bands of hunter-gatherers to cities with millions of people.

Over the past several years, my classes have focused on how we now live in the Anthropocene, an era in which humans have taken control of the earth’s systems (atmosphere, oceans, land, life, and others).

Human agency has led to global warming, probably a more daunting challenge to humankind than coronaviruses, and many other threatening phenomena.

Human control has contributed to the crisis

In fact, some commentators have asserted that the pandemic has resulted from the humans’ super-control of the earth and our encroachment on the last vestiges of nature in areas such as the Amazon rainforest (for some examples, click here, here, and here).

Deforestation (for cash crops and cattle), mining, a growing population, and the expansion of urban areas have put the environment and the species therein under greater stress, making them more susceptible to viruses and zoonosis (jumping of a virus from one species to another, including humans).

Human domination of the planet has intensified over the past several decades. I witnessed the devastation firsthand of the Amazon in 1988 and 1990, during my time in Brazil as a graduate student. I saw gold prospectors who penetrated the deepest recesses of the forest, using clandestine airstrips. I also viewed up close how many square miles of trees had been cut down.


Above, using modern equipment, men prospect for gold by excavating the floor of the Amazon rainforest in Brazil, 1988 (photo by Gene Veritas, aka Kenneth P. Serbin). Below, Gene Veritas (wearing sunglasses) with workers at the mining site (personal photo).



Reconnecting with ourselves, and the planet

In my Big History course just concluded this semester, we were all deeply saddened by the onset of the pandemic. However, in the context of history, a devastating viral outbreak was highly likely. Leading scientists have also warned the world for decades.

The pandemic serves as a global alarm. The Earth is a system, and it is crying out against our dangerous intrusions into rainforests and other attacks on the environment. Ironically, with the decrease in vehicle traffic, the vast reduction in pollution gives us a glimpse of the air quality we once had and must achieve again to stem the tide.

A key lesson of my Big History course is that the modern world led humans to think they were separate from nature, but, in reality, we are ever more interconnected. The pandemic will perhaps force humanity to rediscover our identity (for some, a spirituality) of being one with nature. We are part of the Earth, not over and above it.

As Dr. Mukherjee pointed out, the virus has laid bare many things, such as the inequality of our health system. It has also laid bare our impatience. To overcome the virus, we need to regain patience and, along with it, humility and respect for the planet.

As Dr. Mukherjee and others have urged, we also need to learn from this crisis and make better policy choices for future threats of all types.

(Disclosure: I hold a symbolic amount of Ionis shares.)